Pathways extension 'ineffective'
By Tamar Wilner Monday, 09 November 2009
An extension to a flagship scheme aimed at helping people come off incapacity benefit and start work failed to have any significant impact, a government-commissioned report has found.
The report, published by the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP), found that the Pathways to Work scheme had a "weakly negative" impact in the six areas where it was rolled out in April 2006.
In those six areas, people were one per cent less likely to be in paid work 16 months after claiming for incapacity benefit than those in a comparison area without the programme.
In contrast, the authors' earlier report on Pathways to Work pilot areas found that the seven pilots had increased by seven per cent the likelihood that a person in the area was in paid work 19 months after asking about their entitlement to benefits.
The authors noted that the difference could be partly explained by the first study including all those who enquired about incapacity benefit, while the new study only includes people who made a claim. Varying funding levels for Pathways could also be an important factor, they added.
Report co-author Richard Dorsett of think-tank the National Institute of Economic and Social Research said: "It's slightly disappointing not to see the same signs of a definite effect in the expansion areas as in the pilot areas. There is further work that needs to be done to see what's going on."
A separate report released last month by the DWP found problems with Pathways to Work schemes rolled out in 2007 and 2008. These schemes are operated by private companies and third sector organisations, unlike earlier schemes, which are run by Job-centre Plus.
The report found that the incentive structure for these "provider-led Pathways" encourages them to focus on people considered "job ready", leaving others poorly supported.
Asked to comment on the reports, minister for disabled people Jonathan Shaw said: "As we continue to radically overhaul the welfare system, we need to look again at the help we are giving people to move off sickness benefits and into jobs."
He said a white paper would address these proposals, although the DWP would not give a date for its publication.
- The reports are available via www.regen.net/doc
Latest Stories from Regeneration and Renewal
- Plans submitted for 150 more homes at former RAF site in Somerset
- Leeds Arena procurement wrangle opens at High Court
- Two Teesside schemes awarded £8.1m from Regional Growth Fund
- Enfield unveils 5,000-home regeneration masterplan
- Focus on priorities has allowed us to continue regeneration: HCA chief
Additional Information
Latest jobs Jobs web feed
- Planner/ Senior Planner Cambridge City Council £22,221 - £34,549 pa, Cambridge
- Transport Policy Manager Borough of Poole £38,961 - £41,616, Poole
- Partnerships Officer City of London Starting salary £30,450 - £34,550 p.a., with potential to progress to £39,270, London
- Enforcement Planner (Development Management) Dartmoor National Park Authority Grade 4/5: £19,621 - £28,636, Bovey Tracey, Devon
- Head of Economic Growth Redcar and Cleveland Borough Council Competitive, Redcar and Cleveland Borough Council
- Principal DC planner Randstad Neg, South Coast
- Senior Planner / Associate Broadway Malyan Competitive, Manchester
- Assistant Planner KDH Associates Circa £25,000, Central London
- Local Land Charges Team Leader Randstad £16-£21 per hour, North West London
- Senior Planner Randstad £28,000 - 37,500, London



